ext_33692 ([identity profile] seattleotaku.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] uftaki 2006-03-07 09:19 am (UTC)

Interesting link (thanks!)... And a "Woot!" despite the rest of this. *hehe*

(Formatting glitches... I hates it! Heh)

But I can't help reading into the caveats they use, too... the first "American animation", the first "sequential drawings of characters acting and reacting to each other". "Stop motion animation" becomes "stop motion ... techniques related to animation". So, for instance, the "Humpty Dumpty Circus" of toy animals and acrobats (stop-motion before 1900) isn't "animation"? His drawn characters came before drawn balls and lines and other early tests?

I find it hard to simply apply "first animation" to it.

Okay, so I'm a geek. ^_^

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting